Comments on: 1-15 - Introductions, Part I http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/ a roguelike webcomic Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Timo Pietilä http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-190 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:27:24 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-190 I think that girl on the left was supposed to be Lucky. Which brings logic-error in scene. If Kate notices Aaron at that point she must have noticed Lucky too (Lucky was dancing with Aaron), in which case her comment about "you have got to meet my roommate" is pretty invalid. That makes this girl on the left unlikely to be Lucky, but based on the comments here she should have been Lucky. I think that girl on the left was supposed to be Lucky. Which brings logic-error in scene. If Kate notices Aaron at that point she must have noticed Lucky too (Lucky was dancing with Aaron), in which case her comment about “you have got to meet my roommate” is pretty invalid. That makes this girl on the left unlikely to be Lucky, but based on the comments here she should have been Lucky.

]]> by: Asschen Shukar http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-173 Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:56:43 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-173 Wasnt the girl on the left her? thought that she was Lucky :) Wasnt the girl on the left her? thought that she was Lucky :)

]]> by: Ojomax http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-172 Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:49:26 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-172 It *is* possible for the figure in any of the earlier strips to be female - even the same individual than the one in 1-15, I know females who can make a "change of shape" like that - but it is just a bit strange. Not so much the way the earlier Lucky looks but the way everything about her shouts 'girl' in 1-15... It *is* possible for the figure in any of the earlier strips to be female - even the same individual than the one in 1-15, I know females who can make a “change of shape” like that - but it is just a bit strange. Not so much the way the earlier Lucky looks but the way everything about her shouts ‘girl’ in 1-15…

]]> by: SQLGuru http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-171 Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:25:22 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-171 How did you know after the club scene? Lucky didn't go to Zampona. After I first read this particular strip, I went back through all of the others looking for "the signs" and I must say that there wasn't any previous evidence in either the dialog or the art (I didn't re-read each of the commentaries). While it may be that there was every intention of Lucky being female from the beginning, the interpretations are that Lucky would have been male. For example, look at 1-3. Picking your opposite gender but still using your name (which you would associate with your gender) is a little.....ummmm....odd. Granted, the name Lucky is gender neutral, but even someone named Jamie would associate their name with their own gender first and the opposite gender second (in my opinion). Other questionable facts: In 1-2, the final panel should show a little more "shape" even given the bulky clothes. 1-4 would show more "shadow" in the face forward shots (more like what is in 1-7). 1-8 should definately have show some shape in the clear side shot. Am I upset about it? No. Did I e-mail? No. I'm just calling "Bluff". Layne How did you know after the club scene? Lucky didn’t go to Zampona. After I first read this particular strip, I went back through all of the others looking for “the signs” and I must say that there wasn’t any previous evidence in either the dialog or the art (I didn’t re-read each of the commentaries).

While it may be that there was every intention of Lucky being female from the beginning, the interpretations are that Lucky would have been male. For example, look at 1-3. Picking your opposite gender but still using your name (which you would associate with your gender) is a little…..ummmm….odd. Granted, the name Lucky is gender neutral, but even someone named Jamie would associate their name with their own gender first and the opposite gender second (in my opinion).

Other questionable facts: In 1-2, the final panel should show a little more “shape” even given the bulky clothes. 1-4 would show more “shadow” in the face forward shots (more like what is in 1-7). 1-8 should definately have show some shape in the clear side shot.

Am I upset about it? No. Did I e-mail? No. I’m just calling “Bluff”.

Layne

]]> by: Asschen Shukar http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-168 Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:30:40 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-168 Hehe well i wasnt one of those impolite emailers, i thought it was a nice surprice. Im only wondering how girls can get that much hair under a cap. :P Ow and you already knew that Lucky was a girl after the panel of that party. Hehe well i wasnt one of those impolite emailers, i thought it was a nice surprice. Im only wondering how girls can get that much hair under a cap. :P

Ow and you already knew that Lucky was a girl after the panel of that party.

]]> by: Timo Pietilä http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-163 Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:02:30 +0000 http://www.penancecomic.com/2007/02/25/1-15-introductions-part-i/#comment-163 Funniest thing in this page is Aarons last comment: "Boyfriend?". Kate sure is very aggressive and self-confident. :-) Funniest thing in this page is Aarons last comment: “Boyfriend?”. Kate sure is very aggressive and self-confident. :-)

]]>